Playing Hard to Get Essay

Walster, Walster, Piliavin, & Schmidt use up designed a postulate to show the why wo workforce play hard to bring in when to comes to go bug out. This article is talks some how there argon 2 different types of wo hands when it comes to relationships. One type is the flaccid to motor and hard to attract. Easy to get wo men are girls who are each desperate for affection, who might start to m whatever de spellds for their signifi merchant shipt other, may regard to get serious right away and possibly may give a disease.Whereas, the hard to get women yield something about them that every jackass would want to be with, she knows she is pretty and that every guy would do anything for her. A women knows in her mind, playing hard to get will generate any man go through all kinds of trouble or challenges vindicatory trying to please her and hopefully making the girl like him or even falling in love with him. If a guy, can get to be with her its like winning a gold plunder and gaining respect from all kinds of men because they can recognize that the girl is a hard to get girl.The experimenters judgeed 5 different experiments to test and enamour if any theories can prove about these hard to get girls. essay I was the dissonance theory was the startle experiment was to predict to bring out if wiz had to spend a lot of energy to attain one goal because he would be unappreciative of the outcome. Experiment II was the instruction theory was next to see if two advantages were attainable exclusiveness with nurture and frustration that will increase drive. Experiment III was the Schachtarian theory requires two components just like the learning theory to test the person for trade it love.Both Walsters & Lyons designed a field train and a research lab experiment in to demonstrate that men prefer a booking that plays hard to get. Computer see to iting service was conducted for women to be hired as experimenters. Precise instructions was given on ho w to respond when their computer gimmick called them for a date by pausing to think for at least 3 seconds acquiting the date, which would be labeled hard to get. Other times women were told to accept the date immediately, to be labeled as slow to get. The results indicated that problematicalness had no conflict on the mans liking for his computer.Experiment IV was a laboratory experiment that well-tried the knowledge that a woman is elusive gives one in account evidence that she is socially desirable. This in command evidence should consent the biggest impact when a man has no way of acquiring direct evidence about a coeds value or when he has little confidence in his own ability to assess value. When direct evidence is available, and the man possesses supreme confidence in his ability to make correct judgments, schooling about a womans elusiveness should have little impact on a mans reaction to her.Blind dates were being tested to see if this came true. Experiment V, we h ad decided that mayhap the hard-to-get surmise must be tested in a cozy inuredting with prostitutes that gave the men mixed drinks that will see if the hard to get hypothesis is true. Later this experiment resulted that there is two components How hard or easy she is for him to get & how hard or easy she is for other men to get. To test this, 71 male summer students at the University of Wisconsin were recruited for a dating research project.This was designed to determine whether computer matching techniques are in fact more effective than is random matching. All participants were invited to come into the dating center in order to choose a date from a set of five potential dates. When the subject arrived at the computer match office, they were handed folders containing background information on five women. Some of these women had supposedly been arbitrarily matched with him and others had been computer matched with him but in reality, all five folders contained information about fictitious women.Experiments asked if they liked her, would you get along, first impressions and questions of that nature. All these results of their hypothesis turned out to be false but learned newly information of women being hard to get. In my own opinion, the experiments did their best to test this phenomenon regardless of how old this article is because till this day, a hard to get women is described as someone who requires a lot of work in order to talk or to be seen with.Being with a women gives the man a lot of respect because start to question to figure out what does a man have to do to be such a girl with high standards. These experiments are valid even though they have failed but have demonstrated how these women work when playing hard to get. When it comes to girls, men are usually clueless because there are no set rules on how they react or how to keep them happy. Any interaction with women are general is an experiment because it involves a lot of variables, different possibilities of what the men can say leading to various reactions from the women.A follow up study can be done because this article is over 20 geezerhood old but it may just strengthen the results of this article. A study of how or why women act hard to get in the first place, their intentions or see if there are any tricks to get by these kinds of women. Experiment V was the best experiment to test by randomly selecting girls for the men and seeing what their likes and dislikes were when women were being hard to get. Men today have changed a lot when these experiments have taken place according to bon ton at that time.I feel that these experimenters did all they could with their limited technology and how boys and girls acted in that time frame. Nowadays, women explore all options of being hard to get and easy to get by mixing it to fully get what they want and that drives men insane because we tend to get clueless of how things work. This article is valid of what has been teste d and outcomes that of that women playing hard to get is still unknown till this day.