1. The existent patronage system for snobbish schools         The Howard Government introduced the brisk backing system for private schools in 2001 during an intense debate. The reliable financial support system works under the Howard Governments socio-economic situation (SES) model, which measures the socio-economic office of kidrens p bents based on their postcode instead of communicate each(prenominal) parent questions ab away their income. The socio-economic status refers to the parents ability to financi all(prenominal)y second their school.         Each private school is given a SES score, which ranges from 70 to 135. Schools with students coming from predominantly high socio-economic areas will nettle a higher score and less mount. The aim of this system is to mete out funding on a admits basis. For non- establishment schools, most government funding is authentic in a flash from the Common riches. 2. major(ip) objurgation of the existing funding system         The major criticism of this funding method is that the system does not take into identify a schools private earnings (eg: fees). As a top of this, the overall trend has been to give the biggest increases to the schools that are obviously amongst the wealthiest. eyepatch under the old ERI system (which measured the schools wealth and schools were couch into 12 categories with Category 1 being the wealthiest) at that guide were some anomalies and problems, the new system is criticised as being unfair, and deal the largest increases to the schools that least need them. In the AEU Federal Election fact sail (issued April 2004) it shows the 50 schools that received the biggest increases (up to 300% increase). Of the 50 schools which received the highest increases, moreover one was not previously in Categories 1 - 3. No one can justify a 200-300% funding increase for affluent schools that have already got ahead of the theme timeworn based on their private fee... !

--References --> When I was younger, both of my parents worked to put me through private school. They paid tuition, for books, for transportation and uniforms. in that respect were NO government programs that contributed to the existance of the school, other than the donations through the church service. Now-a-days, the government is giving out vouchers to public school children, whose families cannot afford to gu ide their children to private schools. And who comports for these vouchers? We of course, our task dollars at work. And where does this money come from? Is it the task moneys we are paying(a) for our own public schools; who by the way, are, for the most part, recently in debt. There is suppose to be a seperation amidst church and state. It is time our government took public school money and gave them directly to the public schools. They could then be better panoplied to pay there bills in a timely way and utilise good decidated teachers. If you want your child to attend a private school, get a job, second job and if need be, your child can pick up work during the pass months to help. It is time, we as a society, demand that our government be responsible for all the tax dollars they suck out of our wallets yearly. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full es say, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment